Skip to content
Free report · No signup to scan · Your email never uploads

Free Litmus Alternative — HTML email pre-flight QA

Litmus (now part of Validity Engage — no public price) and Mailgun Inspect (formerly Email on Acid, $99–$199/mo) render your email in real inbox clients and send back true screenshots. Our free Email QA checker does a different job: it reads your HTML in your browser and runs 41 pre-flight checks — Gmail clipping, Outlook-hostile CSS, un-inlined styles, links, alt text, preheader, spam signals — next to simulated Gmail and images-off previews (free) and Outlook and dark-mode previews (Pro), each listing exactly what that client strips (rule-based, not screenshots). Most rendering bugs start as code issues; this catches them before you pay anyone.

Plainly: if you need true client-by-client rendering screenshots, Litmus is still the right tool. Prices verified 2 September 2026.
At a glance

Litmus vs Email on Acid vs Email QA

LitmusEmail on AcidDigiLakshya Email QA
Entry priceNo public price — contact sales (verified 2 Sept 2026)$99/mo (Basic) — link checks need Premium, $199/mo$0 — ten advanced findings unlock with Pro at $35/mo · $280/yr
Core jobTrue rendering screenshots in 100+ real clients & devices, plus spam testing and analyticsRendering previews across real clients & devices, plus deliverability checks41 code-level pre-flight checks (31 free) with plain-English fixes, plus simulated Gmail and images-off previews (Outlook and dark mode on Pro) that list what each client strips — rule-based, not real-client screenshots
Where your email goesSent to Litmus's cloud for renderingSent to their cloud for renderingParsed in your browser — the HTML never leaves your machine
Signup requiredAccount requiredAccount requiredNo — paste and scan

Prices verified 2 September 2026 from each vendor's pricing page (Litmus, Mailgun Inspect) — month-to-month list prices. Litmus was acquired by Validity in 2025 and folded into Validity Engage: its ~$99/mo Basic tier was withdrawn in August 2025 and there is no public price today. Email on Acid became Mailgun Inspect in June 2026; its Basic tier does not include link or image validation, so the tier that matches a pre‑flight check is Premium. Our $0 is the everyday free tier; Pro pricing is on the Studio-Tools pricing page.

What Email QA does

41 checks that catch the usual suspects

Every finding comes with a plain-English "how to fix". Ten advanced findings — Outlook/Word-engine rendering, spam-word scoring, un-inlined CSS, dark-mode hints, the hidden preheader, layout-table semantics, ambiguous link text, CTA consistency, WCAG colour contrast and alt-text quality — plus the simulated Outlook and dark-mode previews are Pro; everything else is free.

Deliverability

Gmail's 102 KB clipping threshold, the unsubscribe link, the hidden preheader and spam-trigger words (those two on Pro) — the checks that decide whether your email even gets read.

Rendering

Email width, responsiveness, web fonts, and CSS that the Outlook/Word engine or dark mode won't honour — flagged from the code before any client mangles it.

Images & links

Missing alt text, non-https or relative image URLs, missing image dimensions, and empty or "#" links that go nowhere.

Structure & previews

Doctype, charset and viewport meta — plus desktop/mobile widths and simulated Gmail and images-off views (Outlook and dark mode on Pro), each listing what that client strips from your code.

The honest part

Where Litmus & Email on Acid are still the better choice

Real client-by-client screenshots. Litmus and Email on Acid render your email inside actual inbox clients — Outlook on Windows, Gmail apps, Apple Mail and many more — and return true screenshots. Our checker never does this. It predicts problems from your code and simulates the big clients' behaviour by rule; it cannot show you pixel-proof of every client.
Real spam & inbox-placement testing. They test sends against actual spam filters and seed inboxes. We check for spam-trigger words and structural signals in the code — useful, but not the same as watching a real filter's verdict.
Analytics and ESP workflow. Litmus in particular adds email analytics, ESP syncing and team review workflows. Ours is a single-purpose pre-flight checker, not an email platform.
Edge-case client coverage. If your audience skews toward unusual clients or you're shipping high-risk interactive email, paid render farms earn their fee. Our 41 checks target the common, predictable failures.

The workflow we'd honestly recommend: pre-flight every email here for free, fix the code issues, and buy real-client renders only for the sends that justify $99–$199 a month.

How it works

Paste, scan, send clean

1

Paste or upload

Drop your HTML email into Email QA as raw markup, a .html file or a .zip. Nothing uploads to a server — it's parsed locally in your browser, so unsent and NDA work is safe.

2

Read the report

41 checks grouped into Deliverability, Rendering, Images, Links, Structure, Accessibility and Content, each with a plain-English "how to fix". The report is free; ten advanced findings are Pro.

3

Preview & re-scan

Eyeball the desktop and mobile preview side by side, fix what's flagged, re-scan, and send with fewer surprises — before deciding whether a paid render pass is even needed.

FAQ

Quick answers.

Is the email QA tool really free?
Yes. Paste your HTML or drop a .html/.zip and the report runs in your browser at no cost, with no signup — Gmail clipping, width, unsubscribe, images, links and structure checks plus the live preview and simulated Gmail and images-off views are all free. Ten advanced findings — Outlook/Word-engine rendering, spam-trigger word scoring, un-inlined CSS, dark-mode hints, the hidden preheader check, layout-table semantics, ambiguous link text, CTA consistency, WCAG colour contrast and alt-text quality — plus the simulated Outlook and dark-mode previews unlock with Pro, which is $35/mo or $280/yr across the whole Studio-Tools suite. See tools pricing.
Does my email get uploaded to a server?
No. The whole pre-flight is parsed locally in your browser — your HTML never leaves your machine, which makes it safe for unsent campaigns and client work under NDA. Litmus and Email on Acid work differently by design: you send your email to their cloud so they can render it in real clients. Neither approach is wrong; ours just never sees your email. More on how we handle files.
Is this the same as Litmus or Email on Acid?
No — and we won't pretend it is. Litmus and Email on Acid render your email inside real inbox clients (Litmus advertises 100+ clients and devices) and return true screenshots. Ours reads your HTML, catches the common, predictable code problems, and adds simulated Gmail, Outlook (Word-engine), dark-mode and images-off previews — rule-based approximations from each client's documented CSS support, each listing exactly what that client strips from your code. Clearly labelled as simulations, never sold as screenshots. If you need client-by-client rendering proof, Litmus is still the right tool. Most rendering bugs, though, start as code issues — and those are exactly what this checker catches, free.
What does it actually check?
41 checks, grouped into Deliverability, Rendering, Images, Links, Structure, Accessibility and Content: Gmail's 102 KB clipping threshold, email width, the unsubscribe link, the hidden preheader, spam-trigger words, un-inlined <style> CSS, CSS the Outlook/Word engine won't honour, web fonts, responsiveness, dark-mode hints, image alt text, absolute-https image URLs, image dimensions, empty or "#" links, security-gateway rewrapped links (Proofpoint urldefense, Microsoft SafeLinks, Mimecast — pasted from a scanned inbox, they break for everyone outside that org), and the doctype/charset/viewport — each finding with a plain-English "how to fix", next to a desktop/mobile preview with simulated Gmail, Outlook, dark-mode and images-off client views.
When should I still pay for Litmus or Email on Acid?
Three honest cases: when a high-stakes send needs final screenshot proof across real clients and devices; when you need seed-list spam testing against actual inbox providers rather than code-level spam signals; and when your team lives on their analytics and ESP integrations. A workflow many teams use: run every build through our free pre-flight first, then spend the paid renders only on the sends that warrant them.
Do these tools use credits or tokens?
No — never. Use and preview every tool with no account. A free account downloads any single result at full size, with no daily limit. PRO adds Download all, every banner size, more share links and saving to your account. A few things keep a small free allowance: QA checks (2 a day with no account, 5 with a free one) and hosted share links (5 a month, 1 a day, live 3 days). PRO is a flat $35/month ($280/year) for unlimited use of all 35+ tools: no credit packs, no top-ups, no per-use fees. Many comparable tools bill per credit (remove.bg, CloudConvert, AdCreative.ai) — here one flat subscription covers everything. See tools pricing.

Catch the code bugs free. Pay for screenshots only when a send warrants it.

41 pre-flight checks with plain-English fixes, plus desktop and mobile previews — run entirely in your browser by a studio that hand-codes Litmus-tested emails for agencies.